- More cleavages, means more interests; America is so diverse, and made up of so many different cultures, the social facts make a great variety of groups.
- The American Constitutional system-when political authority is shared between the president, courts and Congress there are plenty of places where one can argue one's case; More chances to influence policy, more organizations will seek to exercise that influence.
- Weakness of political parties; when parties are strong interest groups work through the parties, when parties are weak, interest groups work directly through the government
- Broad economic developments that creatte new interests and redifine the old ones.
- Government policy helped create interest groups; (wars create veterans,who in turn demand pensions and other benefits); Unions flourished after Congress passed laws in the 1930s that required employers to bargain with unions
- Political organizations do not emerge automatically, even when government allows, and social circumstances seem to require them; Someone takes the leadership role (usually at a personal cost), young and caught up in a social movement, drawn to need of change
- The more activities government undertakes, the more organized groups there will be that are interested in these activities; 1930s-government began making labor and business policies
- Interest group-any organization that seeks to influence policy
- Institutional Interests-individuals or organizations representing other organizations
D. Membership Interests
- Tend to be interested in bread-and butter issues of vital concern to their clients
- Represent business firms, governments, universities and foundations
- Americans have a high tendance to join religious, civic or political associations-giving us a stronger since of civic duty
Incentive-something of value available only to someone who joins the group
- Solidary incentive- sense of pleasure, status, or companionship that arises out of meeting together in small groups
- Material incentive-money, or things and services readily valued in monetary terms
- purposive incentive- the appeal of their stated goals (to recruit members), common in ideological interest groups (attracting members by appealing to their interest in cohererent set of controversial principles); public-interest lobby-organization benefits non-members (highly controversial topics)
- Interest Groups and Social Movements
- The Environmental Movement
- The Feminist Movement (3 kinds)
Attract members with proposive incentives-take strong positions, usually controversial
Groups that take on specific issues, usually for material benefit
- The Union Movement
- Foundation grants, Federal grants and Contracts, Direct Mail
- Well-off people are more likely to join
- Interest groups representing business and the professions are much more numerous and better financed than organizations representing minorities, consumers and the disadvantaged
- Though some argue that most issues in American politics are within the upper middle class, so they are going to be a little biased
- Letter writing, information gathering, dramatic headline news, state protests, file suits in federal court, etc.
- Lobbyists-non-flamboyant, specialists who gather information
- Political cue-a signal telling the official what values are at stake in an issue, and how that issue fits into his or her own set of political beliefs
- Interest groups use outsider strategy to exchange information: Internet, television, toll-free phones, mail, public opinion polls, etc.
- Members of interest groups will work primarily with legislators with whom they agree (lobbyists will make a major effort to persuade an undecided legislator that public opinion is strongly inclined one way)
- The public at large doesn't care about issues, so interest groups will try different campaigns to arouse a small but passionate group to write letters or vote (or not vote) for specified candidates
- Campaign Finance Reform Law 1973-sharply restricted the amount that any interest group could give to a candidate for federal office, made it legal for corporations and labor unions to form political action committees that could make political contributions
- Almost any kind of organization can form a PAC, over half are sponsored by corporations , a tenth by labor unions, and the rest by various groups such as ideological ones
- It is possible that money effects legislative behavior, or contributions may influence how legislators behave on committees on which they serve. No one really knows.
- People fear that when people leave important jobs int he federal government to get more lucrative ones with the corporations or private industry jobs; the public interest may suffer.
NAACP
American Civil Liberties Union
Public Citizen
Assigned Reading:
http://www.initiativesamendment.org/problem.htm
*read the Intro and the Institutionalization of Problems
FRQ: There seems to have been an upper-class bias when dealing with Interst Groups in Washington. The above article talks about how the people can change it, since it is ultimately thier issue. Who's job is it to keep Washington non-biased? How can the people act differently to prevent bias?
Karlee, thanks for the hard work to get your post ready.
ReplyDelete1. Section Review - In class I will emphasize some specific limits placed on interest groups to protect the public interest and aim to prevent secret lobbying by groups or individuals
2. Link: Public Citizen - In a very ironic twist, the story I read on the Public Citizen site boasted that one of Public Citizen's alums was going to get a job as head of the Bureau of Consumer Protection in the Federal Trade Commission - in an apparent revolving door move that would seem to actually benefit the public interest!
3. Assigned reading - This blurb did a fair job at describing the challenges of balancing free speech with powerful special intereststs, but when looking for who was running the website and why, I was surprised to discover that there was very little (none that I could find) information about who was putting this out, and furthermore, that what they were putting out was so radical. Do away with republican form of government? Really? Wow.
Karlee- You did an excellent job with keeping the information concise. However, you didn't explain some things very well and you rarely gave examples.
ReplyDeleteYour link was good, however, there was no explanation.
Your assigned reading went really well with the chapter.
By the way, I understand that you had very little time to put this together and so that explains some of the things I noticed.
ReplyDeleteHey Karl, hope your night off is going well!
ReplyDeleteSo, everything I just got deleted when I visited your link. I will summarize my number 1 and move onto number 2 because I will write everything I have to say for your summary on the board tomorrow.
1. How American ideology affects our participation in interest groups. Solidary, Material and Purposive incentives were interesting. Examples would have been nice in the outline, but I got it with the reading ;-)
One thing that could have used a little more emphasis was Ralph Nader's role as a public interest warrior. Otherwise, great job Karl!
2. The ACLU website just goes to show how much an interest group can affect American policy. The ACLU has moved mountains in the world of liberty with respect to the constitution. Although sometimes their decisions can be seen as harsh (removing 10 commandment tablets at a public school in the middle of a rural area known for its Christian heritage) they ultimately stand up for the liberty and equality of all people (ie Students in public schools who are denied a separate room to fast in during a religious holiday).
3. The assigned reading allows us to examine to what measures Congress is interested in restricting public interest groups. It is a conumndrum because limiting interest groups limits congressmen and women's power.
What's up, KB? :-)
ReplyDeleteOverall, I thought you summarized the first two sections very thoroughly.
There was one problem: I thought that the first bullet under "The Birth of Interest Groups" was a little vague. I know you were kind of operating on a time constraint!!! I would have included an example to kind of better illustrate what that portion was saying. Perhaps by saying that until the rise of cash cropping, farmers had no need for unions because they consumed what they produced? Other than that, I don't see anything major to add.
The NAACP link was really interesting. I am shamefully clueless about most interest groups, so seeing such an important one up close and personal was fascinating. Well chosen!
I loved the assigned reading. It made a lot of great points, and I thought that the comparison of the people with a business (toward the end of the assigned portion) was particularly interesting. Once again, well chosen! I see no problems here!
Hola!
ReplyDeleteSection Review: In class I think I will delve into naming some of the different interest groups involved in each of the movements, discuss the correlation between the size of groups and their beliefs, and review why unions have persisted.
Link-I think the ACLU was a great choice for the links especially because of the section I read. The ACLU is the interest groups of all interest groups looking out for every minority and group possible.
Assigned Reading- I really thought the assigned reading was interesting as it described the connection between Congress and its restrictions on the interest groups. Kind of ironic since interest groups help determine the outcome of a lot of policies and everything!
In class i think that i will spend time on "The public at large doesn't care about issues, so interest groups will try different campaigns to arouse a small but passionate group to write letters or vote (or not vote) for specified candidates" i think these are two important aspects of these sections!
ReplyDeleteThe assigned reading was very interesting talking about the connection of Congress and interest groups.
The link to the Public Citizen is very interesting and informative on the subject and matter!!!